Skip to content

Explanation of Article 547

Explanation of Article 547

The article refers to several reasons related to the partner's person that terminate the partnership contract, which are:

The first reason: The death of the partner; the partnership contract ends with the death of one of the partners because the partnership contract is based on personal consideration between the partners, and the partners have contracted based on personal considerations in the partner himself.

The second reason: The interdiction of the partner; the partnership contract ends if the partner is interdicted due to loss of capacity due to insanity, idiocy, prodigality, or being negligent because the contract is based on personal consideration, and the partners have contracted based on personal considerations in the partner himself, not his guardian or representative.

The third reason: The insolvency of the partner or the initiation of liquidation procedures for him; the partnership ends if the partner becomes legally insolvent or liquidation procedures for his assets are initiated. The termination of the partnership due to insolvency or the initiation of liquidation procedures is based on the same considerations that apply to the termination of the partnership due to the interdiction of one of the partners, as the partnership contract is based on personal consideration, and the partners have contracted based on personal considerations in the partner himself, not his representative.

The fourth reason: The withdrawal of the partner; the partnership contract ends if one of the partners withdraws, as previously explained in the explanation of Article (545).

The second paragraph clarified that it is permissible to stipulate in the partnership contract that in the event of the death of one of the partners, the partnership remains in existence, and the heirs replace the deceased partner, even if among these heirs there is someone who lacks or has diminished capacity, without the need for court permission. The stipulation of this reason, to the exclusion of other reasons mentioned in the first paragraph, indicates that it is not permissible for the partners to agree in the partnership contract that in the event of the interdiction of one of the partners, the partnership continues with his guardian, and similarly in the case of insolvency or the initiation of liquidation procedures; because the partner can obligate his heirs to replace him in the partnership, but he cannot obligate his representative to do so in the event of interdiction, insolvency, or the initiation of liquidation procedures.

The third paragraph clarified that it is permissible for the partners to agree in the partnership contract on its continuation among the remaining partners if one of the partners dies, is interdicted, becomes insolvent, liquidation procedures are initiated for him, or he withdraws.

Article 547

  1. A company contract shall terminate upon a partner’s death, interdiction, insolvency, or withdrawal, or upon the initiation of a liquidation proceeding against him.

  2. Partners may agree that, upon a partner’s death, the company shall continue to exist with the heirs of the deceased partner, even if the heirs include a fully or partially incompetent person.

  3. The partners may agree that, upon a partner’s death, interdiction, insolvency, or withdrawal, or upon the initiation of any liquidation proceeding against him, the company shall continue to exist with the remaining partners.