Explanation of Article 546
The article refers to the provisions related to the expulsion of a partner from the company, and the mechanism for expelling a partner from the company does not lack two scenarios:
The first scenario: The method of expelling the partner and its mechanism is agreed upon in the company contract.
The second scenario: The mechanism for expelling the partner is not agreed upon in the company contract.
The first paragraph clarifies that the partners can agree on how to expel the partner from the company, the reasons justifying the expulsion, its mechanism, and the procedures followed to complete the expulsion. In this case, the agreement governs the matter; the partners have the right to expel the partner if they commit an act that necessitates their expulsion according to the agreement, and the court's role is to ensure the occurrence of the reasons leading to the expulsion as agreed upon in the company contract.
The second paragraph clarifies that if the mechanism and method of expulsion are not agreed upon in the company contract, any of the partners also have the right to request the court to expel one or more partners from the company if there are acceptable reasons, and the court sees them as justified and calling for the partner's expulsion.
It is worth noting what was previously mentioned at the beginning of this section that a partner can request the court to dissolve the company contract and then terminate it if there are reasons that justify this, such as the partner's breach and failure to fulfill their obligations, for example.
However, the system included this article in this section to establish another right for the partners that is less harmful than requesting the dissolution and termination of the company contract, which is the partner's right to request the court not to terminate the company contract but to expel the defaulting partner from it while it continues; reinforcing and aligning with the general principle of this system in the continuation and maintenance of contracts as much as possible. The partner who did not fulfill their obligations is the one who alone bears the impact and influence while the rest of the partners continue without being affected. Similarly, the partner who does not harmonize with the rest of the partners is expelled so that their lack of harmony does not hinder the company's successes. If the partners wish to extend the company's term, and one of the partners does not accept the extension without providing reasonable reasons for this refusal, any partner can request the court to expel this partner while the company continues, so that the rest of the partners can extend the company to a new term. Although expelling the partner from the company is the termination of that partner's contract with the company, it is not considered a reason for the termination of the company contract. The organizer mentioned the provisions related to the expulsion of the partner in this section to avoid any confusion or attempt to analogize expulsion with withdrawal.
Related To
Article 546
-
Partners may include in the company contract the method of removing partners from the company and the procedures therefor.
-
Any partner may, upon the existence of acceptable justifications, petition the court for the removal of one or more partners from the company.