Skip to content

Explanation of Article 52

Explanation of Article 52

After Article (31) clarified the three pillars of the contract: consent, subject matter, and cause, Article (52) and the subsequent articles came to explain the rule of "defects in consent," which refers to:

  • First: Defects that affect the will of the contracting party, leading to the invalidity of the contract, such as: mistake, deception, coercion, and the like.

  • Second: Defects that affect the contract, leading to its nullity or its susceptibility to annulment.

The article stipulates that defects in consent include:

  • First: "Mistake," which is an incorrect perception of reality, leading to the "nullity of the contract," so it does not produce any legal effect, except in cases exempted by the article, which are: if the mistake is "substantial," "non-influential," and "unknown to the other party," in this case, the mistake does not lead to the nullity of the contract.

  • Second: "Deception," which is the use of fraudulent means to mislead the other contracting party, leading to the "nullity of the contract," so it does not produce any legal effect, except in cases exempted by the article, which are: if the deception is "non-influential," and "unknown to the other party," in this case, the deception does not lead to the nullity of the contract.

  • Third: "Coercion," which is forcing the contracting party to conclude the contract, leading to the "nullity of the contract," so it does not produce any legal effect, except in cases exempted by the article, which are: if the coercion is "non-influential," and "unknown to the other party," in this case, the coercion does not lead to the nullity of the contract.

It is worth noting that these defects do not affect the capacity of the contracting party, but rather affect their consent, which is the agreement of the wills to produce the legal effect.

This article is considered one of the most important articles related to defects in consent, as it protects the rights of the contracting parties and provides them with the opportunity to annul the contract if it is tainted by one of these defects.

Article 52

  1. The dispositions of a lunatic shall be deemed to be the same as those of a discerning minor.

  2. The dispositions of an idiot shall be deemed to be the same as those of a non-discerning minor.