Explanation of Article 242
This article addresses the statement of the "effects of debt delegation," which are: the consequences that result from debt delegation. The article stipulates that the effects of debt delegation include:
-
First: "Discharge of the original debtor," which means that the original debtor is discharged from the debt, and the creditor is not entitled to demand the debt from them again, except in the case of incomplete delegation.
-
Second: "Responsibility of the delegate," which means that the delegate becomes responsible for the debt, and the creditor is entitled to demand the debt from them.
It is worth noting that this ruling applies to all types of debts, whether they are contracts, acknowledgments, discharges, or otherwise.
This article is considered one of the most important articles related to the effects of debt delegation, as it clarifies the impact of the effects of debt delegation on the obligation.
Related To
Article 242
-
If an assignment is for consideration, the assignor warrants only the existence of the assigned right at the time of making the assignment, unless agreed otherwise.
-
If an assignment is without consideration, the assignor does not warrant the existence of the right.