Explanation of Article 225
This article addresses the statement of the "effect of settlement," which is: that the settlement results in the extinguishment of the obligation, so the creditor is not entitled to claim the debt, and the debtor is not entitled to refrain from fulfillment.
The article stipulates that the settlement leads to the extinguishment of the obligation, for example: if a settlement is reached between the creditor and the debtor, the obligation is extinguished, and the creditor is not entitled to claim the debt again.
It is worth noting that this ruling applies to all types of obligations, whether they are contracts, acknowledgments, discharges, or otherwise.
This article is considered one of the most important articles related to the effect of settlement, as it clarifies the impact of settlement on the obligation.
Related To
Article 225
-
A creditor may demand payment of his debt from all or some of the solidary debtors, taking into consideration the modalities affecting the debt with regard to each debtor.
-
Demanding payment from a solidary debtor shall not preclude demanding payment from the other debtors.
-
A solidary debtor may object to any demand for payment by raising only objections that relate to him or objections that are common to the debtors.