Explanation of Article 205
This article addresses the explanation of the "concept of indivisibility of obligation," which means that the obligation is indivisible, whether the subject of the obligation is a thing, an act, or an abstention from an act.
The article stipulates that the obligation is indivisible in two cases:
-
First: "By its nature," which means that the nature of the subject of the obligation does not allow for its division. For example: it is not permissible to divide the delivery of a car, the delivery of a house, the painting of an artwork, or the singing of a song.
-
Second: "By agreement," which means that the contracting parties agree that the obligation is indivisible. For example: if the contracting parties agree that the delivery of goods should be in one batch, in this case, the obligation is indivisible.
It is worth noting that the indivisibility of the obligation differs from solidarity in that solidarity relates to the multiplicity of parties to the obligation, whereas the indivisibility of the obligation relates to the nature of the subject of the obligation.
This article is considered one of the most important articles related to the concept of indivisibility of obligation, and it clarifies the impact of the indivisibility of obligation on the obligation.
Related To
Article 205
A debtor’s right to the term shall be forfeited if an insolvency judgment is rendered against him, if he fails to provide the agreed-upon security, or if the security provided becomes insufficient due to his actions or through no fault of his own, unless he takes action to supplement such security.